Showing posts with label Eliot Bernstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eliot Bernstein. Show all posts

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Perjured Deposition Proskauer Rose - MPEG LA for Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein

Part 1
Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition
Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein.

Kenneth Rubenstein - Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose Partner



Hear More on Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein at Eliot Bernstein's Iviewit Technologies Channel - Click Here

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Lockheed Martin Corporation Concealed the Liabilities from Shareholders - Robert J. Stevens CEO Knows and Fails to Disclose

Lockheed Martin, Massive Shareholder Fraud.

The Lockheed Martin Corporation has Hid Billions of Dollars in Liability from the Lockheed Martin Shareholders, Knowingly.

Robert J. Stevens, Lockheed Martin - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Does Nothing to Protect the Lockheed Martin Shareholders from their inevitable Liability, it is not a matter of If.. the Shareholders will pay for the Lies, Cover Ups and Non-Disclosure of Lockheed Martin Corporation but When the Lockheed Martin Shareholders will Pay. And you can bet that the Lockheed Martin Corporation Executive have already protected themselves from this Massive Shareholder Fraud.

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html

What does Robert J. Stevens, Lockheed Martin - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer think of the Massive Shareholder Liability that Lockheed Martin Faces over the STOLEN iViewit Technology.

What Does Lockheed Martin, James R. Ukropina - Chairman, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee think of the Iviewit Fraud that is Undisclosed to Lockheed Martin Shareholders?

Has the Lockheed Martin Corporation Board of Directors been notified of the Liability to Lockheed over the iViewit Stolen Technology and the involvement of iViewit?

What do these Lockheed Martin Corporation Board of Directors think of the Cover Up of Massive Liabilities in the iViewit Stolen Technology: E. C. “Pete” Aldridge Jr., Nolan D.
Archibald, David B. Burritt, James O. Ellis Jr., Gwendolyn S. King, James M. Loy, Douglas H. McCorkindale, Joseph W. Ralston, Frank Savage, James M. Schneider, Anne Stevens, and James R. Ukropina. The Board also determined that Marcus C. Bennett and Eugene F. Murphy

E. C. “Pete” Aldridge Jr.
Nolan D. Archibald
David B. Burritt
James O. Ellis Jr.
Gwendolyn S. King
James M. Loy
Douglas H. McCorkindale
Joseph W. Ralston
Frank Savage
James M. Schneider
Anne Stevens
Robert J. Stevens
James R. Ukropina


Links for More Information the iViewit Stolen Technology and how it affects your Lockheed Martin investment.

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2010/11/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20030425/ai_n10055413/
Enron Connections..

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288
Lockheed Martin Named in SEC Complaint over Massive Shareholder Fraud and have NOT told Lockheed Martin Shareholders.

Sidenote: Lockheed Martin is Connected to Enron, and Proskauer Rose Law Firm sank Enron over the iViewit Technology Theft. Also Note that Textron Industries is Very Connected to Lockheed Martin - Dain Hancock served in various key executive positions before becoming President of Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems in 1995 and Executive Vice President of Lockheed Martin Corporation and President of the Aeronautics Company in 2000. Textron Industries called my home awhile back and Textron industries has connections to people who I believe have been paid to Silence me somehow..

More Coming Soon on Fraud, Corruption and Deception at Lockheed Martin over the iViewit Stolen Patent..

Got a Tip
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Testimony New York Senate Judiciary on Iviewit Scandal, Cover Ups, and Corruption.

Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 1
Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, Attempted Murder, Court Corruption
Patent Attorney Corruption, and Mass Fraud on the Courts in ALL
Judicial Branches, the USPTO and Multiple Supreme Courts.



Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 2
Iviewit Technologies - Eliot Bernstein Testifies on
Massive Corruption Surrounding
the Stealing of the Iviewit Technology.



More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Corruption in the
Iviewit Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal ... Go to..

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV

www.KennethRubenstein.com

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

Lockheed Martin Corruption, Foley-Lardner Corruption, Proskauer Rose Corruption, Intel Corp. Corruption, Time Warner Inc. Corruption,

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel aids and abets Criminals and is involved in the Stealing of Inventions.

Bruce Sewell Flat Out Lies and Technology Media Eats it Up .. Cuz Bruce Sewell is a Big Wig at Apple.. So What.. Bruce Sewell is still involved in Massive Shareholder Fraud.

Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel Use to be a Big Player at Intel Corp. as Bruce Sewell was Intel Corps. General Counsel Before being Big Man on Campus over at Apple.

Bruce Sewell new Full Well about the Iviewit Inventors having their Technology Stolen and used by Intel Corp. and Bruce Sewell simply ignored this FACT. I assume that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel let APPLE know during his interview process.. what he knew.. because see Bruce Sewell wanted that Apple Job pretty bad.. and Apple . .along with Intel Corp. , Warner Bros., AOL, Sony and many other companies involved in a Massive Shareholder Fraud over the Iveiwit Stolen Patent WELL Apple stands to gain Billions over Keeping this Dirty Little Iviewit Technologies Secret. And who knows what "Payoff" or Dark Alley Deal the Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell made with Apple before he got is big ol' Apple Pay Check.

Bruce Sewell is Apple’s general counsel and Bruce Sewell is senior vice president of Legal and Government Affairs at APPLE. Bruce Sewell Reports to Apple’s CEO.

Bruce Sewell serves on the Apple's executive team and oversees all legal matters, including corporate governance, intellectual property, litigation and securities compliance, as well as government affairs.

So Bruce Sewell is a Very Big Deal at Apple and well In my Opinion because I have a Brain and Can Read, Well Bruce Sewell is Corrupt, is involved in Intellectual Property Infringements, Bruce Sewell has participated in cover up a Multi-Trillion Dollar Shareholder Fraud that involves Millions of Innocent Investors and Bruce Sewell is NO where Near One of the Good Guys as Bruce Sewell, in My Opinion STEALS PATENTS.. helps Major Companies like Intel and Apple to easily take inventors patents .. stomp on inventors rights and to raking in Billions .. paying off officials and well Business as usual in the Corrupt "Patent Theft" world of Bruce Sewell.

So we Know that Bruce Sewell left intel under some pretty odd and quick circumstances and well hush .. hush on that right. ?? and we can assume that Bruce Sewell let Apple know of his knowledge of the Iviewit Holdings, Iviewit Technologies Patent Theft and the fact that he knew Intel was using this Stolen Technology and helped them to cover it up.. See this WOULD be a Huge Asset for Corrupt Bruce Sewell to Bring To Apple as their new General Counsel Right? I mean Apple owes Iviewit Huge Royalties as Well Right. .and for over a Decade Now..

So the Apple Responds in Patentgate Bullshit your Reading.. well the TRUTH is APPLE general Council Bruce Sewell is Corrupt and there is NOTHING amiciable about HIM..

Apple Lies About "PatentGate" as Does Bruce Sewell.

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=337

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997

So what is the "Real PatentGate" and What Dirty Deeds is Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel up to now with the headline of Patentgate.. ??

Got a Tip on PatentGate, or on the Corrupt Activities of D. Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel? if so Email me Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Check Out these Links for More on the Corruption of Bruce Sewell ~ Apple General Counsel...

http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997

Click Here for Proof that Bruce Sewell Knew Full Well of the Iviewit Stolen Technology

Click Here for SEC Complaint Naming Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel

Also More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology at

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/iviewit-news-story.html

Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

FBI Coverups, Boca Police Scandals, Major Law Firms Covering Corruption, Enron Collapsing, Attempted Murder, Invention Stolen, Denial of Due Process.

In America only Certain People have rights to Protection from the Law - Most All are just Collateral Damage to Protect Corrupt Attorneys, Judges, DOJ Officials, Corrupt FBI agents, Billionaire Tech Companies, Major Media Companies and Mega Law Firms.

Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...

"" KernelOfTruth says:

There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).

The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.

The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.

If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.

If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf

The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involving public corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.

He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.

The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his name and place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.

According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.

This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also by Stephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.

Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.

For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.

Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s court and the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.

Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).

RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured by Proskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.

With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.


Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:

(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill

(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in a bankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and

(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.

It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.

Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.

The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.

Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.

All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who had perpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.

For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.

The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],

..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departments when the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],

...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and Lardner Law Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].

The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special Agent Joseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.

Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],

.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,

... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]

The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.

We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.

Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.

I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.

A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.

In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.

Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota of protection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.

Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""

Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.


Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees .. so Nevermind...

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Andrew Cuomo Appoints Retired Court of Appeals Chief Justice Judith Kaye to run the Gov. Paterson Probes.

WoW, this should be Impartial, Fair, Just... Come on talk about the Queen of the Attorney Fraternity in New York State that Reaches Everywhere Proskauer Rose Law Firm Is..

Judith L. Kaye would definitely qualify in my book as IN NO way a good pick for this "probe" .. oh unless you want to cover up Zillions in Alleged Crimes - Fraud - or Really Anything.. as with Proskauer Rose connections, Favors Owed, Steven Krane and all the Favors and Influence that Brings ... there seems to be No One that Can Hold Criminals Accountable for Crimes on their Watch...

Here is the Article..

"" ALBANY - Attorney General Andrew Cuomo handed off the politically red-hot probes of Gov. Paterson on Thursday - clearly hoping not to get burned any more.

Just days after a Marist College poll revealed a sizable drop in his approval ratings, particularly among blacks, Cuomo "removed" himself from the potentially explosive inquests.

He appointed retired Court of Appeals Chief Justice Judith Kaye to run the probes.

"This is a legal determination as to what is the best way to conduct an investigation," said Cuomo, who is all but certain to run for governor.

Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed.

"I understand the ferocity of politics of New York and I understand that it is incredibly important to all of us that the public have a 100% confidence that this investigation is being handled properly," Cuomo said.

Cuomo's office is investigating whether Paterson and the state police interfered in a domestic violence complaint mom of two Sherr-una Booker brought against top Paterson aide David Johnson.

His office has also launched a probe into whether the governor got free World Series tickets from the Yankees - and then lied about it to the state's Public Integrity Commission.

Tuesday's Marist poll found the public was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with Cuomo's role in the investigation. His once sky-high approval rating had dropped 13 points in just a week, including a 22-point drop among nonwhite voters, to 45%, the Marist poll showed.

"Politicians are supposed to follow public opinion, he did and the result was a wise decision," said Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf."

Kaye's appointment means the case is likely to drag on for several more weeks - and hang over Paterson as he tries to negotiate a budget with lawmakers.

Kaye will oversee Cuomo's staff of lawyers and investigators, who've interviewed dozens of witnesses and pored over pages of documents in both cases.

Nearly all of the crucial witnesses have been deposed in the probe of whether Paterson, his aides or the state police broke any laws by intervening in the domestic abuse case.

The Daily News reported yesterday that Cuomo's investigators have found little evidence to support a witness tampering case against Paterson.

Cuomo did not deny the story, but said: "Discussing any outcome would be premature."
This week, a handful of witnesses are being called back for a second interview. Johnson, another top Paterson aide, Clemmie Harris, and the governor are to be interviewed as soon as next week.

Kaye will essentially play the role Cuomo would have played, overseeing any presentation to a grand jury, signing off on subpoenas and, in the end, making the call as to whether to prosecute.
Cuomo will be barred from participating in any of these matters.

Kaye, who has no experience as a prosecutor, vowed the "public will have a full, fair and independent accounting of the facts."

Paterson's lawyer Theodore Wells Jr. promised to cooperate with Kaye.""

Source of Post...
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/03/11/2010-03-11_down_in_polls_andy_bails_on_probe_gives_hotpotato_gov_mess_over_to_former_chief_.html#ixzz0hwGdgE2T
So Cuomo wants to Be Gov. - Cuomo's Dad Appointed Kaye to her Judge Job... and now Judith Kaye is Investigating the Current NY Governor.. Hmmm.. nobody sees this as a Conflict.. and Andrew Cuomo has the nerve to say.. "Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed." What is Going on in New York?

Who is Theodore Wells Jr. - what Connections does he have to Proskauer, or History with any of the Attorney Fraternity we talk about on this site... ???

More on Proskauer Rose Affiliations, Conflicts of Interest and Alleged Crimes..
and How Proskauer Rose is Involved in a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft that now has plenty to do with the Corruption in the New York Court System and the Cover Up Power of Judith S. Kaye..
www.ProskauerSucks.com - www.DeniedPatent.com - www.Iviewit.TV

Got a Inside Tip on any of this.. Email Me At
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

A Veteran Judge, Never a Prosecutor, Is Seen as Well Suited to Investigate the Governor - Judith S. Kaye - David A. Paterson - New York Courts

"" The new chief investigator who stepped into the spotlight in place of Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo on Thursday was a judge for a quarter century, not only in title but also in temperament.

Cuomo Hands Paterson Case to an Ex-Judge
(March 12, 2010)

Times Topic: Judith S. Kaye

That, say people who know the state’s retired chief judge, Judith S. Kaye, may be a strong enough résumé point to make up for a lack of prosecutorial experience as she takes over the politically volatile investigation of Gov. David A. Paterson and his administration. In a long legal career, she never worked as a prosecutor.

But her appointment could add to the investigation’s credibility, said George Bundy Smith, who served with Judge Kaye as a judge on the state’s Court of Appeals until he retired in 2006. “She will be objective, and that is the main thing you look for in an investigation like this,” Judge Smith said.

In a statement on Thursday, Judge Kaye thanked Mr. Cuomo for entrusting her “with these serious and important matters.”

“I promise,” Judge Kaye added, “that the public will have a full, fair and independent accounting of the facts.”

Former prosecutors said that though Judge Kaye lacked a track record of making prosecution decisions herself, her career on the state’s highest court and, before that, as a litigator in civil cases, provided her with many of the skills needed to navigate not only the management but also the political sensitivities of the investigation.

“Regardless of what decision she reaches, her decision will be respected because of who she is and what she brings to the table,” said Alan Vinegrad, a former United States attorney in Brooklyn.

Judge Kaye, 71, was first appointed to the court in 1983 by the current attorney general’s father, Gov. Mario M. Cuomo.

She became chief judge in 1993 and was widely praised when she retired as the longest-serving chief judge in 2008.

Mr. Paterson said at the time that she would “go down in history as one of the greatest chief judges this state has ever had.”

Benito Romano, a former United States attorney in Manhattan, said that Judge Kaye’s reputation as a careful judge might be exactly what was needed to calm political anxieties. “It should provide people who are concerned about the decision being driven by politics with great reassurance,” Mr. Romano said.

On the court, Judge Kaye was considered liberal on some issues, including gay marriage and the death penalty. But she often sided with the prosecution in criminal cases and sometimes said that her rulings defied simplistic labels.

With a domestic-violence case as one of the aspects of the inquiry, some lawyers noted her history of interest in that issue. In her role as the chief officer of the sprawling state court system, she made it plain that she had a special commitment to working on the problems of domestic-violence victims.

She created special domestic-violence courts to provide victims with social and other services, saying that the complex cases required an integrated approach that went beyond the letter of the law.

Before she was named to the bench, Judge Kaye was a prominent civil litigator and the first female partner at Olwine, Connelly, Chase, O’Donnell & Weyher, which was one of the city’s blue-chip law firms.

Since she retired from the court, she has been at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.

While there, she headed an investigation into the State University at Binghamton’s athletic scandals that was critical of officials for compromising standards when the school moved into major college athletics. ""

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/nyregion/12judge.html

Are You Kidding me, Judith Kaye Investigating anyone for anything is Riddled with Conflicts of Interest, Cronism, Favoritism, Political Ties, Political Favors and will certainly not be unbiased in any way what so ever in my opinion.

As I have been following the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent case and It seems to me that when Judith Kaye was Judge, the Criminal did as they pleased and that she allegedly covered up for Trillions of Dollars in Crimes that Proskauer Rose Law Firm was accused of, as in the Alleged Trillion Dollar Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent.

Remember .. yes Judith Kaye is now a Widow, However, her then Husband was Stephen Kaye a Proskauer Rose Partner - and her whipping boy was Steven Krane.. big wig in New York Ethics and well THEY run New York along with the Connections at Proskauer Rose - which are connected to the Really Big Money and Political Ties and WELL - Judith S. Kaye will Certainly NOT Add ANY credibility to an investigation on ANYONE..

Who is George Bundy Smith... I mean Really.. he thinks Judith S. Kaye adds "Credibility" ARE YOU KIDDING... ???????????

I just see No Way that Judith Kaye adds ANY Credibility to this Investigation.. in My Opinion Judith Kaye .. Ex-Judges adds the Element of ... ok Whew not someone has my Back and I won't get into trouble.. Judge Judy will Hide my Ass and ALL will be Well...

didn't Judith S. Kaye Create that Athletic Scandal... or was some part of creating some smoke screen or diversion so the bad guy could get away.. hmmm.. I cannot keep up with the Alleged Corruption out of New York.. and where there is Alleged Corruption I cannot help but notice a Proskauer Rose Cronie Connection..

"greatest chief judge" "calm political anxieties"???? What a Crock !!!

other links for more information on Judith Kaye, Proskauer Rose and Iviewit Technologies..

http://nylaw.typepad.com/new_york_civil_law/2007/03/chief_judge_jud.html

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.ProskauerSucks.com

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger...

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Proskauer Rose LLP - Jeff Marwil Confirmed as Chapter 11 Trustee for Life Fund / A&O Bankruptcies. Proskauer Rose Bankruptcy Trustee - Scary..

Jeff Marwil, Proskauer Rose Confirmed as Chapter 11 Trustee for Life Fund / A&O Bankruptcies - Folks be VERY alarmed at this... this Means that the Creditors Lose and the Attorneys Win. We will examine who the Bankruptcy Judge is on this, who the Department of Justice Trustee is and just how much room for Bankruptcy Corruption there is on this one.

In writing on the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy, and in Reading the detailed blog of an Industry Insider - the Bankruptcy Whistleblower on the Summit 1031 Blog at www.Summit1031BkJustice.com ... and all the incredibly similar stories I have heard about and studied over the last year it is pretty obvious to me that the "Business Model" of Bankruptcy Corruption is Where the REAL Money is.. and the Model for Bankruptcy Corruption includes a Judge and a Department of Justice Trustee that is Corruptible, a State Government that Promotes Transparency and Open Government but in No Way actually tries to make it a Reality, a Bankruptcy Attorney - Trustee that has major Political Connections - Judge Connections - Money Connections - Law Enforcement and Judicial Connections and boy the slide of hand - the Smoke and Mirrors - Billions created in Illusions while they take HUGE amounts of Money for NOTHING... really and No One seems to notice or even question....

Meanwhile the Victims, the Creditors wait silently for the Almighty power of the Bankruptcy Trustee to give them any money at all - so they Remain Silent while their Pockets are Drained.

The Company that went bankrupt, such as the Petters Scandal - the Standford Boys.... well they just want this to all go away and to stay out of jail so they can spend that money that Law Firms like Proskauer Rose (allegedly) hid for them in the "islands", the Caribean, or the "London Office"... at any rate it remains obvious that the company who went bankrupt hid their assets... just look at all the Lehman Brothers Choas and the Selling off of Neuberger Berman for way to little to create a diversion .. Proskauer Rose cleaned up that Mess... Big Money in Corrupt Bankruptcies that is for Sure...

Everybody wins or slides by .. except for the Creditors, the Real Victims and the US Department of Justice lets the Tax Payers get Raped by the Bankruptcy Courts and they just look the other way... guess it is Deadly to Stand up to Boys like the Attorneys at a Proskauer Rose ... I mean look at Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies - his car was bombed so badly it blew up cars around him... his brother in law stabbed, I write about the Iviewit Case and Get Death Threats... More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at www.Iviewit.TV

Proskauer Rose is Above the Law from what I have seen and any court letting Proskauer Rose over see a bankruptcy.. well the Creditors may as well give up now...

And as in the Lehman Bankruptcy.. and all those Big Banks Going Down.. Well These Billionaire get Bail Outs by the Trillions of YOUR Tax Dollars... the Circle of Illusion Keeps winding around and making Slaves of the Victims, the Creditors, the Tax Payers...

So stay tuned as this Self Proclaimed Investigative Blogger ... takes a Deeper Look at this Bankruptcy and ALL Bankruptcy Court Proceedings that ANY Proskauer Rose Attorney Was Every involved in... WHY?

Well my fascination with Proskauer Rose Started with how in the World a Law Firm can create such an Illusion that a TRILLION dollar patent is in the Wrong hands for almost a Decade? And Proskauer Rose seems to have done this Slide of Hands thru the Corrupt US Bankruptcy Courts.
So Here we go.. Got a Tip on a Proskauer Rose Attorney Involved in a Corrupt or Suspected Corrupt Bankruptcy Proceeding?? who was or is the Department of Justice Trustee, how do they all know each other?? work together before... related... are You an Insider? a Whistleblower... a Truth Seeker??? email your Story to Me Crystal L. Cox investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - We say No More Proskauer Rose Law Firm Being Above the Laws of this Great Country.

Here is This Current, and Very Scary Bankruptcy News...

"" CHICAGO, March 9 -- /PRNewswire/ -- On March 8, 2010, Judge A. Benjamin Goldgar of the United States Bankruptcy Court in Chicago confirmed a creditors' election of Jeff Marwil as chapter 11 trustee in the consolidated cases of Life Fund, 5.1 LLC; Life Fund, 5.2, LLC; Houston Tanglewood Partners, LLC; A&O Resource Management, LP.; A&O Life Fund, LLC; A&O Bonded Life Assets, LLC; and A&O Bonded Life Settlement, LLC, overruling the objections of the U.S. Trustee's Office and of the original chapter 11 trustee, Patrick Collins, who was appointed by the U.S. Trustee's Office at the beginning of the bankruptcy case. Jeff Marwil is an attorney with Proskauer Rose in Chicago.

The cases involve over 722 investors in bonded, life settlement contracts who appear to have been defrauded in their investment. The bankruptcy estates, however, include sizeable interests in life insurance policies. Most of the investors live in Texas.

The election of Mr. Marwil was invoked and won by a Group of Investors represented by Houston counsel Deborah J. Fritsche and Lori Hood with the Johnson, Trent, West & Taylor law firm, and local Chicago counsel Brian M. Graham of SmithAmundsen. Johnson Trent and Smith Amundsen are members of USLAW NETWORK, a national organization composed of over 60 independent, defense-based law firms with over 4,000 attorneys covering the United States and Mexico.

At Johnson Trent, a successful legal practice is measured by the outcomes achieved for clients. Respecting client needs and understanding their business is at the heart of what we do. It is critical to immerse ourselves in our clients' businesses – taking on complex matters in order to exceed client expectations. With more than 25 litigators, we have the depth to serve all civil litigation needs. For more information on the firm, please visit www.johnsontrent.com.

Smith Amundsen LLC has grown to 130 attorneys with offices in Chicago, Rockford, St. Charles, and Woodstock, Illinois and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Our attorneys share a proficiency in a broad range of practice areas. As one of Chicago's premier firms, Smith Amundsen's success is built upon a foundation of integrity, professionalism, and a commitment to exceeding client expectations. For more information on the firm, please visit www.salawus.com.

Brian Graham

https://profnet.prnewswire.com/Subscriber/ExpertProfile.aspx?ei=80606

SOURCE SmithAmundsen, LLC ""

I would Call and Warn the Bankruptcy Judge or Proskauer Rose 's Insurance Carrier, however I am sure that they are behind them on it.. just like When the Century 21 Owner was overheard saying, I know what my agent is doing is Corrupt, I know they break the law and yes I know people get hurt - but Hey ... it MAKES ME MONEY!!! so I overlook it...

The Liability Insurance of Proskauer Rose Law Firm has to be in on their Crimes, they are to Good, to often and Make to Much Money... and the Standford Case, well I am sure that Proskauer Rose 's Liability Carrier knows about that one and they have most likely been told not to worry that it is handled.. because Proskauer Rose Controls, or thinks they Control the US Court System at the Highest of Level with Strategic Moles, Rats, and Players everywhere they need to be so that Proskauer Rose WINS....

Bankrupty Corruption is the Biggest Business Left Standing after our Major Economic Collapse..

As the Life Fund / A&O Bankruptcies plays out email your tips, suspected corruption, inside information to us and be included in our Industry Whistleblower Network, Our Bankruptcy Corruption Network and more... and GET your STORY heard..

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

A&O Life Funds - Proskauer Rose LLP

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Warner Bros. Signed Non Disclosure Agreements with Iviewit, Warner Violated those Agreements. Warner Signed License and Service Agreements..

Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.

Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?

And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...

Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.

" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT

The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].

The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.

*
Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.

1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.

· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.

· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.

Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234

· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf

· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html

· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf

· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf

August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf

It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.

Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.

Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.

Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.

Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.

The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.

o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.

The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.

· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf

· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.

Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf

The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.

I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.

The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""

Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Iviewit Stolen Patent Case - On What or Whose Authority is P. Stephen Lamont Acting On?

Why is Stephen Lamont Threatening to End the Affairs of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox? Why is Stephen Lamont Demanding that I Copy him on my emails to anyone regarding the Iviewit Company?

Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threat my Life, and my "Affairs", just because I posted a document and words THAT were NOT mine... ???

Does Stephen Lamont have the Legal Authority
to Speak on behalf of the Iviewit Company?

Can P. Stephen Lamont Legally File Federal Documents to QUASH Eliot Bernstein's Motion .. when Mr. Lamont was Fired, Long .. Long ago ?

Iviewit, Eliot Bernstein Says:

" Lamont was not approved by any board, as the board disbanded illegally and without noticing the shareholders and so I hired lamont and offered him stock in the company. Later we learned from Garber and other law firms that we could not act on behalf of Iviewit in official capacity until the books and corporate records were fixed, approximately 50k and that is why lamont claims he was advised by counsel to work outside the company and not as an officer, as he legally was never an officer."

More on Iviewit.. and Lamont
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of.html


Posted by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

Industry Whistleblower

This is not My Story .. it is However, the Greatest Patent Story every Told, and well I find it intriguing So I post about it.. I Found the Information on www.Iviewit.TV where the story has been running for 8 Years.

I link to that site in Which Stephen Lamont also promotes.

SO why threaten me for posting information from that site and directly from the REAL owner .. and one of the Inventors of the Iviewit Patent.. Why Terrorize me for simply reading a Website and posting pieces of it on my site and linking to the site...??

Why has, P. Stephen Lamont, an Alleged Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies Inc. Threatened me for posting information that is not mine.

And it is Reported to ME that Stephen Lamont has Joined and or Created a Hate Group, and is actively recruiting others to join him in this group that is threatening to Incarcerate me, Burn Me at the Stake, Ruin Me, and Telling Lie upon Lie about me.. and my Business.. all because I Posted Excerpts from the Iviewit Website.

I just don't Understand. I have no Bad intentions.
I am simply writing about an 8 Year Old Stolen Patent Story
that is and has been already on the Web for 8 years....

Not my Story...
I am Just a Modern Day
Investigate Journalist.. which means
I Read..
I Post...
that Simple..

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.iViewit.TV

Crystal Cox Blog

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Intel - Proskauer Rose - New York Courts - Foley Larder - Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson in New York September 2009

"" « September 24, 2009 Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »

September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, SGI & Lockheed Martin.

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman

SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor

ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL

5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY

8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY

11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY

14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.

Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.

This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""

Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159

posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Friday, February 5, 2010

CEO Lamont Interfaces With President of Microsoft TV

"..August 05, 2009 "


"CEO Lamont Interfaces With President of Microsoft TV
Category: Web, HTML, Tech

Enrique, "

"It has been a long, long time and I hope all is well with you and yours. We have watched the Google/On2 technologies deal with interest, and, as a counter, I would like to introduce you and Microsoft to Iviewit Technologies, Inc. where we believe we hold the patent pending rights to the: (i) backbone, enabling technology for the encoding and transmission of video across all networks and viewable on all display devices; and (ii) image overlay systems, the effective inventors of digital zoom. At your leisure, please look at our website (sans all the legal jargon and car images inserted by our passionate founder) and let me know what you think.

As a last word, the patent filings are in need of some repair and continuance, but you can see where we fit in video by the attached slide. Look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net ; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont ; www.iviewit.tv "

Source of the Above Quote
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=114167543&blogId=504031809

******
Question, Does P. Stephen Lamont have the "Authority" to email Microsoft on behalf of Iviewit Technologies ? Who is the "We" P. Stephen Lamont is Referring to? Up until an Email P. Stephen Lamont send me yesterday I thought he was was working on behalf of Iviewit, and for the best interest of the shareholders, but Emails Correspondence I have been Privileged to over the last couple of days Suggest Different.

More information on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at Eliot Bernstein's website www.Iviewit.TV or my Blog on the Fascinating Story of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at www.DeniedPatent.com

Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower

Acting as the Current CEO of the Iviewit Technologies, Inc. P. Stephen Lamont Demands Federal Intervention..

"January 07, 2010


By Electronic Mail and Facsimile

Dear Ms. Sheppard:

As we previously discussed, following up on our March 20, 2009 meeting, and representing the citizens of the State of New York, we have exhausted our remedies at the new Department of Justice (“DOJ”). At the close of the March 20, meeting, you requested, and we accepted, that we exhaust our remedies at the new DOJ and if nothing is done by the new DOJ concerning the unconscionable state of affairs in New York surrounding the commission of Federal crimes by State courts, Federal courts, and public officers, the Subcommittee and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (“AO”) would either partner with DOJ to act or pick up from DOJ as the case may be; as the present state of affairs is clear (inaction by the DOJ), we respectfully request that you abide by your March 20, 2009 representations and “pick up from the DOJ” either singularly or in conjunction with the AO.

Furthermore, as I have previously written, startling NEW revelations have been made, not the least of which, are: (i) representation of INDIVIDUAL defendants by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York; (ii) knowledge of WITNESS TAMPERING and threats without the absolute requisite actions of a FEDERAL JUDGE; (iii) offers of COMPENSATION TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL by the Office of the New York State Attorney General in return for settling the case out of court; (iv) miscellaneous instances of error by a FEDERAL JUDGE whether purposeful or not; (v) individual(s) JAILED for nothing more than the political whim of State Judges; (vi) children ripped from their mothers, with NO visitation, by nothing less than monied spouses paying their “insurance premiums” to court officers and other members of the judiciary whether directly, or indirectly through what are so called “legal fees” to their counsels; (vii) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE to be revealed in the future testimony of Honorable Rory J. Bellantoni; and (viii) instances of ELECTION FRAUD.

Additionally, the list can go on and on, but most notably, an attorney has come forward with incontrovertible evidence of the 2005 murder perpetrated by a Port Chester, N.Y. policeman of the policeman’s girlfriend, a crime that was subsequently covered up as a suicide by and between the Port Chester Police Department, the sitting District Attorney of Westchester County, N.Y. and the incoming District Attorney-elect.

As you are aware, and from November 2008 to March 2009, we, in representation of the citizens of the State of New York, have submitted nine (9) affidavits with incontrovertible evidence of many outrageous and criminal acts by certain individuals within and about the State and Federal court systems in New York that have been substantially overlooked for no other reason than their favored position or political affiliation.

Parties that will attend this proposed meeting are:

Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Former Staff Attorney at the New York State Supreme Court First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Kevin McKeown
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Aggrieved individual in the State of New York

Luisa C. Esposito
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Sexual Assault and Battery Victim

P. Stephen Lamont
General Claims: Civil Racketeering (18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act)
Bio: CEO, Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

Hon. Rory J. Bellantoni
General Claims: Obstruction of Justice
Bio: County Court Judge, Westchester County, N.Y.

TBD.
General Claims: Election Fraud
Bio: Forthcoming

TBD
General Claims: Cover up of a 2005 murder of a citizen of the State of New York
Bio: Forthcoming

Lastly, Ms. Sheppard, considering these serious matters, the state of affairs in New York will never right itself absent Congressional intervention. Therefore, in a follow-up face-to-face meeting before the Subcommittee, select members of the Subcommittee(s) or its counsel, and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts where supplied with further evidence, it will become crystal clear for the need of such Federal intervention; it is respectfully requested that you abide by your previously stated representations at the March 20, 2009 meeting.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; www.iviewit.tv "

The Above QUOTE is from the Link Below
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=114167543&blogId=525027421
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.,P. Stephen Lamont,
Former CEO Lamont, Eliot Bernstein,

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com
Crystal L. Cox Whistleblower

Crystal Cox - Whistleblower

Crystal L. Cox

  © Blogger template 'Isfahan' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP