Showing posts with label IBM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IBM. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Intel - Proskauer Rose - New York Courts - Foley Larder - Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson in New York September 2009

"" « September 24, 2009 Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »

September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, SGI & Lockheed Martin.

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman

SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor

ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL

5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY

8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY

11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY

14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.

Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.

This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""

Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159

posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Khulumani optimistic ahead of apartheid court case - and the Greedy Evil IBM Connections to All This.

"" WITH the class action lawsuit brought against companies alleged to have collaborated with the apartheid regime due to resume in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Monday, support group Khulumani said last year had been a significant year for the case.

The last-ditch attempt by six corporations, including Daimler and Ford, to stop the application from continuing, will be heard.

If the corporations fail, the matter will proceed to a jury trial.

In April last year, the Southern District Court of New York dismissed some claims brought by Khulumani against corporations that had been identified merely for doing business with SA’s apartheid government.

The surviving claims are against companies accused of aiding and abetting serious crimes such as torture and extrajudicial killing, committed in violation of international law by the apartheid regime.

Khulumani national director Marjorie Jobson said yesterday the turning point was in April when Southern District of New York Judge Shira Scheindlin found that corporations could be found responsible for aiding and abetting human rights abuses that violated customary international law, through their relationships with rogue governments.

Scheindlin said litigation would contribute to the continuing process of truth recovery about apartheid, its causes and effects, and who might be found to bear responsibility.

The claimants then filed an amended application in May against Daimler, Ford, Fujitsu, General Motors, IBM and Rheinmetall.

They sought an order declaring that the companies aided and abetted the commission of apartheid, in violation of international law. They want the court to award the claimants punitive damages arising out of the unlawful behaviour .

Jobson said other positive developments included Justice Minister Jeff Radebe writing a letter to Judge Shira Scheindlin in August supporting the New York court as a forum for the case, and a brief by the US government which told the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in November that the appeal by the defendants, which wanted the case to be stopped, should be dismissed.

Jobson said the court had asked the parties to submit opinions on whether the violations of customary international law for which the Alien Tort Claims Act provided jurisdiction could encompass noncriminal conduct, and on whether customary international law recognised corporate criminal liability. ""

http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=90867

Corporate Greed need to have their Dirty Deeds brought to Light. It is Not Ok to hurt people, Violate Peoples Rights, Kill People in the Name of IBM or Ford making more Paper - more Green Paper.

It is Seriously Time for Corporate Accountability.

Judge Shira Scheindlin seems to have a conscience and seems to be able to See through the Chronic Lies big Corporations tell along with the damage they do to Real People along the way, as their Attorneys Cover Up for them and seem to own most every court in the land somehow. Hopefully the Good Lawyers, and Good Judges can start speaking out and Doing the Right Thing and finally get some where in STOPPING the Evils of Corporations such as IBM, Ford, and Other Mega Corporations that deem profit more important then people.
Corporate Responsibility
Related Links
www.ibmTheWidowMaker.com
IBM
also Check Out Connection David Kappos of the USPTO has to IBM, Connections Kenneth Rubenstein of the Mega-Law Firm Proskauer Rose connections to IBM- and the connections that Proskauer Rose has to the New York Supreme Court and the New York Bar.
IBM
Also see www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV for what Corporations - IBM included have been able to do to the right of inventors, their human rights, civil rights, and quality of life. And for IBM connections to Judges, Patent Attorneys, USPTO and More Conflicts of Interest tha assist IBM in their behavior.
Ibm

Sunday, December 27, 2009

I B M - THE WIDOW MAKER and THE ORPHAN MAKER

B Y
M A D A M E P J B A I L E Y

A W H I S T L E B L O W E R ' S M E M O I R

P A R T 1 - N O B L U E S F O R B I G B L U E

P A R T 2 - I C A N S H O W Y O U B E T T E R T H A N I C A N T E L L Y O U !

S U B - T I T L E : T A K I N G O N I B M F O R $ 1 0 0 0 O R L E S S

P A R T 3 - O H, L E T T H E S U N S H I N E I N !

S U B - T I T L E : W H Y T H E F R E E P R E S S & N E W S M E D I A S T I L L
R E I G N A S T H E 4 T H B R A N C H O F G O V E R N M E N T

From an Awesome Website....

This is Incredible Stuff Folks, Check it Out and Spread the News.... We are Bloggers, We are Warriors of Light... We are Walking into Rooms where Bad things have Reigned KING for Centuries Upon Centuries and We are Turning on the Light for All to See...

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
" Plaintiff Carolyn Bailey's August 28, 2006 proposed Dispute Resolution for

BAILEY V. PALMISANO ET AL

New Jersey Superior Court Docket # 05236-06 Law Division Essex County Civil Action

1. International Business Machines (IBM) will establish (within 6 months) a wide spread public awareness campaign that will last at least 5 years, directed at persons who have worked around industrial grade chemicals during the last 40 years.
IBM's campaign would educate and encourage those individuals to take a cancer screening blood test or equivalent medical tests, if such are accurate.
In the event that the individual cannot afford the tests, IBM will offer some form of financial assistance/counseling to enable and encourage all affected individuals to take the medical tests.

This public awareness campaign could be patterned after the ongoing anti-smoking and responsible drinking campaigns of the tobacco and alcoholic beverages industries.
IBM's campaign should include announcements in multiple languages, and should be disseminated in the press, over the airways, on billboards, on IBM's Internet site, and in all other places where it is likely to attract the attention of a broad spectrum of the general public and health care community.

Plaintiff has no objection to IBM seeking or establishing the cooperation and/or some financial participation of other employers, government agencies, etc. But the primary responsible for the coordination and fulfillment under this Resolution would be borne by IBM.

Plaintiff notes that the late Philip J. Bailey. Jr.'s multiple myeloma was detected by a blood test a year before there were apparent physical symptoms.
That gave us our last "doctor/hospital free" year. Our extended family used that "extra" time to prep ourselves, as best we could, for the glum months that awaited us. The enactment of this Resolution would offer that same gift of time to countless others and their loved ones.

2. IBM will offer "in lieu of" settlement awards to those current and former IBM employees and their family members who qualify for such awards but for the existence of time bars or other statutes of limitation. In other words, those uncompensated employees or their family members who:

a. Worked at IBM's manufacturing sites in jobs that exposed them to industrial grade chemicals; and,

b. Suffered or experienced diseases and disabilities similar to those suffered or experienced by compensated current or former employees and/or their families,
will be eligible to the "in lieu of" awards.

IBM will make every effort to identify and contact such persons or their next of kin.

Plaintiff notes that the medical bills and pain and suffering are just as real for persons, like herself, who had no reason to connect the disease, disability, or death to on-the-job chemical exposure.

3. IBM will offer to Plaintiff and Infant Alyce Bailey a settlement that will sufficiently compensate them for their loss and injury.

4. The Defendant Attorneys and their respective law firms (individually or collectively) will offer to Plaintiff and Infant Alyce Bailey a settlement adequate to compensate them for any and all injuries and stresses they suffered because of the deeds and misdeeds of the Defendant Attorneys and their respective law firms. "
IBM

Crystal Cox - Whistleblower

Crystal L. Cox

  © Blogger template 'Isfahan' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP