Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Perjured Deposition Proskauer Rose - MPEG LA for Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein

Part 1
Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition
Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein.

Kenneth Rubenstein - Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose Partner



Hear More on Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein at Eliot Bernstein's Iviewit Technologies Channel - Click Here

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

MPEG LA involved in Major Video Technology Theft. MPEG LA LLC stole the Iviewit Video Technology

Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General.

More Iviewit Proof of Fraud and MPEG LA Involvement. Proskauer Rose LLP Corruption. Patent Fraud ?

June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General

" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064

Dear Mr. Ramos:

This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.

You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.

I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats

The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.

(1) In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.

The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,

(2) established the Standard Specifications.

(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.

II. The Proposed Arrangement

A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders

(4) ("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:

(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);

(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and

(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.

(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.

(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.

(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."

(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."

(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.

(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.

(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"

(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.

(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.

(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.

(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.

(16) In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.

(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.

(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."

(19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."

(20) Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.

(21) The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.

(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."

(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)


Full Letter and Source of Post
http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/busreview/2485.htm

Save and Print the Above for Your Records.

Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY knwo that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.

No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.

More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

GOOG, MPEG LA LLC,

MPEG LA illegally Using Iviewit Technology and Making Billions. What Does MPEG LA Management Think of the Stealing of Iviewit's Invention

What Does MPEG LA General Counsel Alexis DeVane think of the Massive Liability that MPEG LA has taken on in Getting "in bed with" the Corrupt Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein of the Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose.

MPEG LA is Illegally Licensing and making Billions Every year from the iViewit Technology that is Worth 13 Trillion Dollars and MPEG LA General Counsel Alexis DeVane along with other MPEG Management Ignores this Criminal Activity, Fraud, SEC Violations, RICO Complaint and Massive Liability to the MPEG LA Company.

There are over 1200 documents of proof, www.DeniedPatent.com - and Lawrence A. Horn President, CEO JP Gascon CFO, Alexis DeVane General Counsel, Dean Skandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance, William L. Geary, Jr. VP - Business Development, Jessica Sullivan Director - Royalty Services, Scott Mladinich Director - Information Technology, Tracy Edwards Director - Contract Administration, Allen Harkness Director - Global Licensing, Heidi Moore Controller, and Jeffrey Westfall Director - Global Compliance, STILL ignore the massive lawsuits, liability, fraud, Criminal activity and Flat Out invention THEFT over the iViewit Technology Stolen Patent.

Lawrence A. Horn President of MPEG LA seems to NOT be concerned at all with a 13 Trillion Dollar Liability over the FACT that MPEG LA put STOLEN inventions in Illegal Patent Pools.

Dean Skandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance Officer of MPEG LA seems to be in charge of MPEG LA illegally Licensing the Iviewit Invention in Which they HAVE no LEGAL Right to even be Using. And Dean Skandalis Senior VP is supposedly the Compliance Officer of MPEG LA, are You Kidding? MPEG LA steals a Technology and illegal puts this technology in Illegal Patent Pools and that does not raise and RED FLAGS FOR Dean Skandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance Officer?

Jessica Sullivan Director - Royalty Services of MPEG LA surely knows of the iViewit Stolen Technology RIGHT? I mean it is Everywhere and MPEG LA is on my Whistleblower Media Blogs EVERY SINGLE DAY !!

More on the Iviewit STOLEN Technology that MPEG LA is Illegally Using

www.Iviewit.TV ...

Got a Tip on MPEG LA or anyone in this Post?

Email Me

Crystal L. Cox

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney for MPEG LA - Involves Attorney Raymond Anthony Joao.

Kenneth Rubenstein 's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working DIRECTLY under Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein 's direction.

Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.

No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Raymond Joao and Kenneth Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.

Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao

Raymond Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.

More on Raymond Joao Click Here

Source of Above and LOTS More
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm


More on Iviewit Massive Shareholder Fraud

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

www.BruceSewell.com

www.iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

posthed here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Proskauer Rose Law Firm involved in Mass Cover Ups of Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent.

"Where once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer Rose has gone through elaborate steps to obstruct justice and deny due process of complaints against them.

Through abuses of public office positions and a series of diabolical conflicts of interests at Supreme Court bar associations and in a civil court in Florida, where initial complaints were filed, including a counter complaint.

The counter complaint was denied to be allowed and in this civil billing case Proskauer Rose won through a default judgment after the judge dismissed two sets of Iviewit counsel and granted Proskauer Rose a victory for Iviewit's failure to retain replacement counsel.

This case will be appealed pending information from the investigations, because as it turns out, Iviewit defended companies it did not own, as Proskauer Rose appears to have sued the companies they fraudulently set up to own the stolen patents.

That once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer Rose made a desperate attempt to rid the shell companies that they had put the Stolen IP into and gain control of the assets through a lawsuit claiming monies owed, while their management referrals tried and involuntary bankruptcy claiming monies owed.

In fact, the company was not even aware that Proskauer Rose and their management had taken such actions.

The company was notified by members of AOLTW/WB while seeking a twenty five million dollar raise that such legal actions were found while doing their due-diligence but the company was never made aware they were even lawsuits or bankruptcy, as these were for companies named similar and identical to the shareholder companies but not owned by the shareholders.

Upon learning of the legal actions and involuntary bankruptcy the company through a friend and hero (and you will learn of many who have helped carry the torch this far through personal sacrifice and risk), Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq. fired the counsel we were unaware we had and filed the counter complaint in the civil case and filed in the bankruptcy.

We retained new counsel, Steven Selz, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, and others to begin to peel the onion and file back but Judge Jorge Labarga would not allow us to present our case and through denying due process and procedure threw the case. All prior counsel was fired that had been prior representing the companies without authorization and this new team took over the cases.

At the time, it was not known that two sets of identical companies had been set up and that the companies we were now defending were not owned by the shareholders but by the companies lawyers. Therefore, Iviewit at the time thought that it was representing companies that its shareholders owned.

It was not until the USPTO found that certain patents listed by the attorneys as assets of the Iviewit companies, where not in fact owned or assigned to the parties the attorneys listed on the IP dockets, (USPTO LETTER SHOWING THAT CERTAIN IP ASSETS THOUGHT TO BE IVIEWIT ASSETS ARE OTHERS) that evidence of the multi-layered corporate and patent shell scheme began to surface.

Identically named companies, as illustrated in the Company History section, were formed to transfer stolen IP in the wrong inventors names and with no assignment or ownership to shareholders; fascinating, like a shell game of hide the real patents.

Upon attempting to ascertain why the patents were all wrong in inventors, assignees, owners and content, it was learned that dual named corporations were set up and again the information has been forwarded to state and federal authorities and the company is awaiting the outcome of these investigations.

Federal and international authorities have been notified that the organization MPEGLA LLC and other patent pools now controlled by our former Proskauer patent attorneys are acting as anti-competitive and monopolistic criminal enterprises to further aid in the theft and proliferation of the Iviewit inventions through a tying and bundling scheme.

This scheme denies paying royalties to the Iviewit Shareholders including the SBA.

Why, you may ask, is Proskauer Rose LLP a former real estate firm since the 1800's, suddenly controlling patent pools that directly infringe upon the Iviewit inventions, after Proskauer Rose learned of the inventions directly from the inventors?

In fact, Proskauer Rose attorney Kenneth Rubenstein, a member of the Advisory Board for Iviewit and lead patent counsel to MPEGLA LLC, is now trying to claim that he never heard of Iviewit under deposition (Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition) and sworn statements to a civil court.

Where evidence shows Rubenstein's direct involvement, Kenneth Rubenstein is found to be a BIG FAT LIAR..

Evidence such as his name in the Iviewit billings and letters from executives of AOLTW/WB showing that he opined favorably on the patents to induce investment from them, contradicts his perjured deposition.

Evidence like his name as an Advisory Board Member in a Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, co-authored, disseminated and billed for by his firm Proskauer Rose and hosts of other evidence clearly showing his knowledge and involvement.

When confronted under deposition with such evidence, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP refused to answer direct deposition questions (at his civil billing case) and left his deposition stating that we would have to have the court order him back to answer questions that directly affect the shareholders.

The court did order him back to the answer the questions but before he could be re-deposed the civil case trial was thwarted by the judge. Iviewit after being released of retained counsel by the judge never got the opportunity.

Kenneth Rubenstein who swears under deposition, under sworn statements to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and in a written statement to Judge Jorge Labarga of the civil court in Florida to have never heard of Iviewit, the Iviewit inventions or inventors; cannot be the same Kenneth Rubenstein opining favorably on the Iviewit patents to AOLTW/WB -

(click here for AOLTW/WB letter dusting Rubenstein's statements and exposing him for perjury).

Source and More
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent
and the Massive Shareholder Fraud

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

Microsoft Brings MPEG-LA-LA Land to the Web and Threatens GNU/Linux With Software Patent Lawsuits

All these Patent Lawsuits These days among Huge Companies Like Google and Apple and Today Microsoft, MPEG LA GNU, Linux - what a mess all these is I mean do they even own or did tey even invent the patents they are fighting over..

"" Summary:

Microsoft is trying to sneak patents-encumbered MPEG formats into the Web using Internet Explorer 9 (IE 9); Microsoft threatens (again) to go after Linux legally IN OUR previous posts about IE 9 [1, 2] we mentioned not only security problems but also Microsoft’s ’support’ of the video tag, which we expected to have a negative side when implemented by Microsoft.

It now turns out that Microsoft — just like its buddy Apple — is trying to piggyback Web video to push H.264 into the standard. The W3C’s new CEO (Novell's former CTO who brags about software patents and helped create the patent deal with Microsoft) is unlikely to have a problem with this as the three people in his working group are from proponents of software patents (Apple, Microsoft, and IBM).

Here is the news article outlining Microsoft’s patent-saturated vision of the Web:
The rough version of IE9 that Microsoft demonstrated includes HTML5 video encoded with a particular technology called H.264. Apple’s Safari also supports this encoding and decoding technology, or codec.
But Mozilla is adamantly opposed to open-source-unfriendly H.264, supporting the rival Ogg Theora codec instead, and Opera is in that camp with its new version 10.5. Google’s Chrome supports both, tying the score at Ogg Theora 3, H.264 3.

Mozilla is fighting for us, but will it be enough? Mozilla is strongly against software patents, just like most companies that are without a monopoly (patent trolls don’t qualify as companies). According to this new post from Miro (formerly known as Democracy Player), the fight for free codecs intensifies and Wikipedia puts its weight behind it.

This is a concept that I had thinking about and trying to nudge towards reality for a long time; I’m thrilled that we’re finally there. There’s a bunch of interesting aspects, but perhaps the heart of it is a chance to bring open video to mainstream users and strike a blow for freedom.
Wikipedia is the most popular site in the world that posts video exclusively in open formats (specifically, theora).

The steadfast commitment that the Wikimedia Foundation has to open information, tools, and formats, is amazing. They truly put their values first.

We are respectfully concerned that the W3C suffered some form of entryism in the sense that everyone there is a proponent of software patents, except Tim Berners-Lee, which is just so ironic and sad.

Why are proprietary software monopolists given so much control over the Web’s direction? How was it allowed to happen? Even Apple, the company that’s attacking Free software using software patents [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] and getting criticised for having software patents that harm the Web (this goes over a year back), was given a valuable seat, alongside its supportive friend, Microsoft. For those who have not read the past few days’ posts, Microsoft is openly supporting Apple’s action [1, 2, 3] against GNU/Linux. Only yesterday we quoted some of the latest FUD from Gutierrez (endorsement for Apple’s legal team), who led Glyn Moody to writing a sensationalist headline which he pushed into Slashdot. It says: “Is Microsoft About to Declare Patent War on Linux?”
Microsoft’s comments on happenings outside its immediate product portfolio are rare, and all the more valuable when they do appear. Here’s one from Horacio Gutierrez, “Corporate Vice President and Deputy General Counsel”, entitled “Apple v. HTC: A Step Along the Path of Addressing IP Rights in Smartphones.”

By now, all the alarm bells should be going off: this is from Microsoft’s top intellectual monopoly bloke, writing about one of the most surprising and potentially disruptive lawsuits in the world of technology – and one that doesn’t even involve Microsoft directly. Why on earth is he doing it? Answer: because Microsoft has something very important to communicate.

Translated: smartphones are mostly about the kind of software that Microsoft produces; we have lots of patents in this area, and we are going to collect much more in this area – if necessary, through lawsuits (“continued activity”) of the kind Apple is bringing.
The question, of course, is against whom will Microsoft be bringing those lawsuits? And the answer, presumably, is everyone that makes smartphone software stacks, since these computer-like technologies will doubtless overlap with some of the doubtless broad and obvious patents that Microsoft will claim to have.

Some companies, used to these kind of games, will simply cross-license stuff if they have a big enough portfolio of similarly obvious patents. Others will just cough up some dosh to get Microsoft off their backs. But amidst all these conventional players, there is one very unconventional one: Linux, in its various mobile incarnations.

Taking legal action against *all* companies producing software stacks for smartphones would allow Microsoft to claim with some semblance of plausibility that it was not specifically targeting Linux this time (unlike its previous sabre-rattling statements about patent infringement that were specifically aimed at Linux).

But the net effect would be that Linux would be the chief victim of such an approach, since any companies using it in their smartphones are likely to end up doing deals with Microsoft – and hence implicitly accepting its claims – whatever the open source community might think or want. It would be like Novell’s pact with Microsoft, writ large and much worse.

We don’t agree with Moody’s exaggeration here. Microsoft is just beating the bushes (it’s sometimes called “shakedown”) in order to find more sellouts like I-O Data and Amazon [1, 2, 3, 4]. In the next post we will show that Microsoft uses other companies to launch lawsuits against GNU/Linux. It’s very much apparent at this stage and it takes extreme discipline to sincerely deny this. ""

Source
http://boycottnovell.com/2010/03/18/microsoft-threatens-with-fud-mpeg4/

Expose Corruption - Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven Krane, Proskauer Rose, Time Warner Inc., Bruce Sewell, Intel Corp., Gerald Lewin, MPEGLA, and More.

Who is Allowing the Corruption To Continue?

When the Sleeping Giant Awakens the Corruption Will End.

You are the Sleeping Giant ~ Once you Awaken to the Truth, there is NOTHING they can do. When you all truly wake up - they are the Minority and Truth, Justice for ALL and Doing the Right Thing Once Again Becomes Simply Just the Way things Are.

We the People Do have a Voice in saying NO MORE to Corporate Greed, Enough is Enough to Court Corruption and Favortism to Big Legal Firms at the Expense of YOUR life... your livlihood and your very Life. We the People Need to stand Up and STOP all these Elite Super Powers from Being Above the Law, Immune to Human Rights and Seemingly having No Morals or Ethics of any Kind. They will NOT STOP until you NOTICE and say Enough.

We the People Can Begin to Do That by Standing Up for the Iviewit Inventors in this Blatant, Obvious Attorney Protection, Court Corruption, USTPO Fraud, Attempted Murder, and the US Justice System Boldly standing for the Criminal just because they are Billionaires and Have amazing connections and Political Power.

We intend to File in the Criminal Code in Each State and County, with the Department of Justice, within the State and Federal Courts against EVERY criminal In this Blog. All the Tech Companies, Attorneys, Judges ... who have thus far been above the law - they NOW answer to We the People. Time For Accountability at Every Level.

To do this you Do not have to be Part of a Lawsuit, you simply have to be someone that knows the facts. All these guys who have Legally side stepped the Legal System and have controlled the State Bar Associations in Multiple States, these Patent Attorneys Committing Fraud, the Head of the Patent Office, the Intel Boys, all the Attorneys who Lied and Committed Fraud, the Politicians Involved, the Cheneys, Lockhead, MPEGLA, and All the Companies and Individual People, Judges, Attorneys On this Website.

We, in Mass will complain to State Boards everywhere they are licensed, file Legal Complaints that when the "Cleaners" and the Clerks of Court throw them in the ROUND FILE, we then file again For Obstruction of Justice.

In the United States, All Due Process has been Stripped from the Iviewit Inventors. Their Patent was Stolen by their Patent Attorney. The Department of Justice, Supreme Court, Patent Office, SEC, and State Bar Associations involved are doing Nothing About it. They seem to be ignoring this Blatant Crime and Some Courts have even simply dismissed it for no good reason at all. This Attack on Citizens Rights of the United States is nothing NEW, what Can Be NEW is that WE THE PEOPLE make a Stand and Demand Justice, Demand Accountability.

Those who brag about protecting Intellectual property rights, they are No Where to Be Found. You See they only protect the rights of patents they don't want and protect the patent thieves to Legally Get Away with Patenting Other Peoples inventions for their gain.

I understand wanting to Silence, Rob, Kill, and Keep these inventors down... and well Reasons to Ignore the Iviewit Shareholders... you see when the Cheneys, Lockheed Martin, IBM, Intel, Proskauer Rose, and the Biggest and the Richest are involved.. Shutting Up, bankrupting and Quieting the Voice of the Real Inventors, well this is the only way to Stay in Power....

So why not honor contracts, and why not set this right?

Well now they have to "Save Face" and NEVER admit that this really happened, so they will keep Iviewit in Court and Make them jump hoop after hoop, .. Trillions OFF Dollars they have to use in Fighting against the now penniless inventors... well you do the math... Add to it Death Threats, Car Bombings and Economic Terror and well the Power Elite Wins.

We the People Cannot ALLOW this.

Real The Documents on this Site, ( www.DeniedPatent.com ) Read the Iviewit Site and Blog and if you have time the THOUSANDS of documents at www.Iviewit.TV and you SEE the TRUTH is blatantly being ignored by the United States Justice System in Order to Protect the Power Elite.

Folks These Criminals, these True Evil Doers, these Economic Terrorists and attempted murders.. they answer to YOU.

If you sit Silent they keep doing this to People Over and Over.

We the People must say NO, and one way to do this is Talk about this Story and to Name Names. Reprint anything from this site, please link to www.DeniedPatent.com and to www.Iviewit.TV And Share this Story of a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist - These Patent Theives, these Corrupt Judges - Corrupt Attorneys and the Supreme Courts that Deny Due Process they NEED to Be Exposed.

Please Share the Iviewit Story on ALL your Blogs and Websites. Post links to documents and Get ALL Eyes on all this Big Corporations for What they have Done.

Expose the New York and Florida Supreme Court and State Attorney Bar for the blatant ignoring of Viable Proven Crimes and Ethics Violations by Attorneys Licensed in their State.

Expose the USPTO, the United States Patent and Trademark Office for their part in Denying these Inventors their Rights. Expose Companies Such as Time Warner Inc. , AOL, Sony, for Contracts they Denied and for VIOLATING Confidentiality Agreements.

Expose Major Tech Companies for Signing Non-Disclosure agreements and for Using Stolen technology with No Compensation for Inventors Rights. IBM, Intel, Sony, and all the Big Players on this Blog - Time to Tell On them. Post These Stories on Your Blogs and Websites and Link Back to Us.

Help Us Expose Corporate Greed, Corrupt Courts, Corrupti Judges, Attorney Favortism and the Power Elite Ruining Lives and Even Killing Inventors to Keep - Use and Profit from their Inventions.

Expose Major Law Firms that have side deals, connections, conflicts of interests and big money to make sure that Real Justice and the TRUTH or the Real Facts of a Case Do not actually even get into court. Stop Favortism among high profile attorneys with Total disregard for the Truth.

Stand With Eliot Bernstein and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology and be a Part of Changing The World. We the People have the Power.

Make videos and talk about any of the names and players in this blog. Tell us anything you know anything about any of the Companies, Judges, Courts, Attorneys on this BLOG, send me a Link - Crystal@CrystalCox.com Or Email your "Tip" - the Truth is No longer Taboo, the Truth is what we crave and the TRUTH is what We Seek.

Is this ALL about Money for the Inventors ?

Yes Iviewit Inventors deserve the Patent and The Royalties that Criminals IBM, Intel, MPEGLA and more are reeping the REWARDS from, however it is bigger then that.

If we let them get away with this then which one of you is next?

If your not in the "Club" not one of THE Rich - Powerful - Elite and you invent something GREAT... something life changing .. something they themselves call the Holy Grail... well you are Powerless.. without Money - BILLIONS and Connections Globally - You Never get the Rights to What you Really Invented, and the Shareholders never get what is owed to them for their courage in investing in an Unknown Group of Inventors.

Now with Years upon Year of Proof.. .. business plans .. .bank statements .. letters, emails, court documents... Thousands of Documents proving that all the courts, attorneys, judges involved seemed to just MAKE IT GO AWAY... and so here we are Case Proven COURTS refusing TRUTH - Refusing Due Process and the Rights of the Citizens.

And EVEN with Contracts in Place with Intel, Sony, Warner Bros. and way more that they are denying exist.. still The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, and all those who govern intellection property.. and the FBI.. how can they all Do NOTHING when the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors and Shareholders have been violated to such an Extreme?

My guess is the Courts are afraid of IBM's Money, afraid of Cheney and Lockheed, afraid of Proskauer Rose.. and the Courts - the Highest law of the land in every state involved and The United States Justices System as Well as Congress and Our New President.. well they are Afraid of these Super Powers.

And therefore Contracts with inventors - this does not matter, the Rights of Shareholders Does not matter, the Quality of Life of the Inventors themselves certainly Does not matter for THEY fear the Power Elite more then Some Guy that they Can Easily Bankrupt, Silence, Put on the Run and Ruin his life so much that Surely he Will Just Shut Up and Slink Away.

Please Post On your Blog, your Website, your Forum and STOP the Power Elite, Stop the Bilderber Cronies, Stop the Above the Law Proskauer Rose. POST their Secrets on your Site and Start a Revolution... one that Says We the People HOLD you Accountable for What you Have Done. We are Watching you, Everyone one YOU involved in this Trillion Dollar Heist and RUINING families, Stealing Lives, and Standing Firm in the Kind of Corruption that Denies Us All Quality of Life, Freedom of Opportunity and Real Justice and Liberty For All.

Take Back Your Country.

Start Now with Standing Firm against the Elitist Tyranny of IBM, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Intel Corp., Sony, Warner Bros., and all the Tyrants on this Blog ( www.DeniedPatent.com )

Demand Accountablity from The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, the FBI and All those your Tax Dollars Pay to Let this Happen to Guys Like YOU...


Eliot Bernstein is just a Guy, he has a Wife and Kids.. a family.. he works toward making this world a better place for all of us and even in the Face of Car Bombs, Economic Terror and 8 years of being put on the run by these Super Powers.

You can still find him on Forums, on Chats, Commenting on News articles and Speaking up to Protect the Iviewit Inventors, To Fight for the Original Iviewit Shareholder Rights, to Fight for his families right for a Real Life again and he Stands Penniless, Tattered, Silenced again and Again... and this is a Stand for All of us in hopes that the Dark Does not Win.

Those who are part of this Trillion Dollar Patent theft, they are Secret Society People, Bullies, Connected to Bilderbergs, Politicians, Connected To Congress, Control the US Patent Office, they are Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Bar Association that look the other way when Injustice is Served up to those Out of "the Attorney Fraternity". These "Bad Guys" are ruining the Peaceful way of Life that we All Want.

When we make this stand for Iviewit, For Eliot Bernstein - for the Inventors of the Iview Technology and for the Iviewit Shareholders, WE The People Stand and We Say ENOUGH is ENOUGH.

We do NOT stand with the Criminal.
We the People stand with the Victim.

Corrruption in the Courts, Corruption in the US Patent Office, Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Mega-Rich Technology Companies, Favored Attorneys, and All those allowing this Corruption at every Level - Expose them - Write about them, Tell US What you Know about them, Blog about them ... it is Time for Accountability - Time to Tell the Truth.


The DO NOT Win.
WE the People WIN.

We the People Say No to the Stealing of the Iviewit Patents by the Patent Attorney and his Cronies and we VOW to Fight all those involved.

Fight for Boycotts of ALL Companies, Fight the US Patent Office, Fight that State Courts, the Federal Courts and all who WILL NOT look at this.

For if we do not, then each one of us can be next in line for Set ups, Car Bombs, Jailing, Beating, Theft, and Severe Life Altering Economic Terror.


Read Through www.DeniedPatent.com
Iviewit
And Check out www.Iviewit.TV

We will be adding more Soon, We will Teach you how to Play by Play File Criminal Complaints against each person and we will Expose each top level Person Responsible for the People under them that Committed this Heinous Crime.

Your Voice is Important.

court corruption

You Can Make a Difference.

Expose the TRUTH on any Player in the Game of Treason, this High Finance Crime Game Seemingly LEGAL in the United States of America. Email me your blog on these people, politicians, courts, patent office or email me your story on These Judges, USPTO Kappos, IBM, Steven Krane, Intel, Bruce Sewell, Brian Utley, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Roy Reardon, Florida Bar and Court System, New York Bar and Court System, Silicon Graphics, MPEGLA and all those on the www.DeniedPatent.com that have been involved in this Theft and are STILL actively participating in Sweeping it Under the Rug of Silence ... of Corruption...


Speak Up Folks Join the Iviewit Revolution To STOP those in Power from Keeping us Down, Keeping us Silent, Telling Us to Sit Down and Shut Up, Keeping Us in Court til' we Give up on the Truth or Starve to death .. taking our children with us.

Speak Up and lend your Voice
to STOP this From GOING on ONE Day Longer.


Read the document on this Site and Join as we become Millions Strong of We the People ... Legal Minds ... Bloggers .. People Who Know the Court System .. People who Know How to Make Noise in Congress ... People who Know the Secret of Why this Happen...


We Will be Filing Complaints and EXPOSING All the Companies on this Blog that Let this Happen... So Are Ya In? Post our Stories, Steal my Content - Give us a Link and EXPOSE this Crime at Every Level.
Stop Corruption

Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Stop Court Corruption