Showing posts with label Ruth M. Pollack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruth M. Pollack. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Rita Adler Smackdown - Rita Adler NY Corruption. Ruth Pollack, Esq. Testimony New York Senate Judiciary Committee.

Ruth Pollack, Esq. Testimony at the New York Senate Judiciary Committee
Regarding the Corruption in New York Courts and the Actions of a Grievance Committee Chair named Rita Adler. Listen Closely, Got a Tip - eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com



Ruth Pollack, Esq. on the Break Down of the System and on Fixing the System. Ruth Pollack, Esq. wants to be a part of the Solution and NOT part of the Problem.

They wanted Ruth Pollack, Esq out of the Eastern District of New York - Why?

Why is Rita Adler above the Law and Sending Documents such as this video discusses to James Pelzer Clerk of the Court, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department ?

Who really protects the Corrupt Rita Adler?

Well for one it is George Demos and those hundreds of Millions JP Morgan covered up in the Peter Sivere scandal, where George Demos Covered for JP Morgan and Rita Adler Covered for George Demos.

Who Else Protects Rita Adler's actions?

Well folks Proskauer Rose Law Firm has Cronies in the New York Supreme Court, on the New York Bar and well, in every court really and Proskauer Rose protects JP Morgan, who, as we discussed protects George Demos.. it is all connected and Rita Adler KNOWS that she is PROTECTED to act OUTSIDE the LAW, period.

Also we have the conflict of interest with Rita Adler and Noel D. Adler Right?.

Noel Adler is the Chief Information Officer, Unified Court System and IS Rita Adler's Husband Right? Sounds like it comes in handy to me..

Much More on Rita Adler and James Pelzer CORRUPTION coming Soon..

Source of Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUs88vRwD1I


More on Rita Adler Corruption

http://www.petersivere.com/

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM136_100801_dismissal_letter.html

http://www.seconddepartment.com/

http://www.jamespelzer.com/


More on Ruth Pollack Esq.

I Will Not Be Threatened by Mr. Cuomo. Re: Pollack and Chesney v. State of NY Click Here for Document.

Ruth M. Pollack Re: Chesney v. Valley Stream

Appeal Denied, Documents - Files apparently just walked off... Click Here for Denial...

Do you have a Tip on the Corrupt Actions of Rita Adler, James Pelzer, George Demos or anyone involved in this Post?

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Thursday, April 8, 2010

In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack - James Edward Pelzer

"" In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, admitted
as Ruth Marie Pollack, an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner;
Ruth M. Pollack, respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 1892660)

By letter dated January 27, 2009, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial
District informed the court that the respondent was convicted on September 26, 2008, of criminal contempt pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rule 42 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.

She was sentenced by the Honorable Allyne R. Ross to unsupervised probation for a period of two years and suspended from the practice of law in the Eastern District of New York for a period of 45 days.

The Grievance Committee submitted certified copies of the judgment dated September 26, 2008, the memorandum and verdict dated September 19, 2008, and the sentencing minutes dated September 26, 2008, and took the position that the respondent’s conviction qualifies as a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) and 22 NYCRR 691.7(b). Notwithstanding that order of suspension, the respondent continued to practice law in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.

Accordingly, by order dated December 31, 2008, the Committee on Grievances for the Eastern District of New York suspended the respondent from the practice of law before that court for a period of two years.

The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District also submitted a certified copy of that order to the court and served the respondent with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 informing her of her right to file a verified statement setting forth defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.

The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 26, 1983, under the name Ruth Marie Pollack.

Upon the papers submitted to the court, it is ORDERED that on the court’s own motion, the respondent Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f) as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, continuing until further order of this court;

and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and
until further order of this court, the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is commanded to desist and refrain from

(1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another,

(2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority,

(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and

(4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth
Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against the said Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, based on her conviction of a serious crime; and it is further,

ORDERED that Rita E. Adler, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 102, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding; and it is further,

ORDERED that the petitioner Grievance Committee shall serve upon the respondent and the Special Referee and file with this court a petition within 30 days after receipt of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent shall serve an answer to the petition upon the petitioner and the Special Referee and file the original answer with this court within 20 days after service upon her of the petition; and it is further,

ORDERED that the issues raised by the petition and any answer thereto are referred
to the Honorable James A. Gowan, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, 90 Sequams Lane East, West Islip, N.Y. 11795, as Special Referee to expeditiously hear and report, together with his findings on the issues, and to submit a report within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing or the submission of post-hearing memoranda; and it is further,

ORDERED that if the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack,
has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3
to impose reciprocal discipline upon the respondent is denied as academic.

PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SPOLZINO and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court ""

Source of Post
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/motions/2009/M88523.pdf

Crystal Cox - Whistleblower

Crystal L. Cox

  © Blogger template 'Isfahan' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP