Christine C. Anderson - New York Whistleblower Speaking Out Against "Well Connected Attorneys" and "Preferential Treatment"

"John Lovett, the lawyer for the fired lawyer, Christine C. Anderson, told the six-member jury that his client had been fired in retaliation for exercising her First Amendment rights in complaining to court officials that well-connected attorneys received preferential treatment and that the committee had "whitewashed" certain cases. "

http://www.judicialaccountability.org/articles/lawyersuesforwhitewash.htm
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,

" Christine C. Anderson contended that her June 2007 firing was in retaliation for complaints she made to her superiors at the disciplinary committee that at least nine cases had been handled too leniently because the lawyers being investigated were politically connected or were represented by attorneys who had previously worked for the committee (NYLJ, Oct. 30, 2007)."
http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/?m=200904
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
Documents on Court Case
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents.html
Thomas J. Cahill

Anderson v. The State of New York
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080616%20Anderson%20Docket%20with%20Eliot%20as%20Plaintiff.pdf
Christine C. Anderson
"Former First Department Disciplinary Committee Attorney Christine Anderson's $10 Million Lawsuit Proceeds Against Corrupt Discipline CommitteeIn allowing Anderson to proceed with her retaliation claim, New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin found that her contention that the committee had "whitewashed" as many as nine cases touched upon a subject of public concern and was protected under the First Amendment. Can New York State residents now hope to see the start of an end to the NYS corrupt courts that harm, neglect, and harass the innocent?"
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7560
Thomas J. Cahill
"A former staff attorney at the First Department Disciplinary Committee has filed a federal
lawsuit charging she was fired in June in retaliation for complaining that her superiors had
engaged in a "pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints against certain select attorneys."

Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10 million in damages, claiming retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and
discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and black."
http://www.legal-disclosure.com/documents/grievanceLawsuit.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill

Public Office Corruption - Related to the Christine Anderson Whistleblower Case - Scheindlins' Failure to Report

Judge Scheindlin Finds "Systemic" Public Office Corruption in the Legally Related "Whistle Blower" Lawsuit - then Scheindlin Dismisses Eliot Bernsteins Complaints in a Seriously Flawed Dismissal and Failure to Remove and Report Misconduct and Conflict.

The Corruption in the New York Courts is Out of Control and there seems to Be No Way to STOP it - It is Time for We the People To Pay Attention to What is Going on.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf

Read this Document Pertaining to the Iviewit Stolen Patent and the Relationship to the Corruption in the New York Courts.

$$$$$$

April 2009 Decision and Order by Scheindlin, in the "Legally Related" lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin formally judicially declared the validity of the Anderson Lawsuit as a "Whistleblower". Judge Scheindlin advancing the case on allegations of "Systemic" Public Office Corruption within the New York Supreme Court involving agencies directly implicated in Plaintiff-Appellant's case herein and directly involving the conduct of several major law firms names as Defendents...

Public Office Corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department and the New York Court Appellate Division First Departmnet - Departmental Disciplinary Committee is center stage in Judge Scheindlin's Decision advancing the Anderson Lawsuit Trial...

Click on the Document in this Post and read all these connections.. and then in January Scheindlin Dismisses iviewit as their Issues being MOOT and not based in Fact... the Corruption in the New York Court System is Blatantly Obvious and No One Seems to Be Looking at it.
Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin
and Don't Forget to Check Out the January 2012 Smackdown - Dismissal - Talk about Double Standards - Conflicts of Interest - Corruption - Denying Due Process
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20100109%20US%20Court%20of%20Appeal%20Denial%20of%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20and%20Appeal.pdf

More on this Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin

New York Second Circuit Courts are Blocking Due Process, Blocking the Truth. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Christine C. Anderson and Iviewit

Now in the Iviewit Case, we know that this Case is Legally Related to the Christine C. Anderson, New York Whistleblower Case Right?

We know from all the Information, Proof, and Documents on www.Iviewit.TV and on www.DeniedPatent.com that the Iviewit Inventors have had their Technology Stolen and that the Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose that is involved in this Trillion Dollar patent Heist seems to be Protected by the New York Courts and the Florida Courts as Well as the New York and the Florida Attorney Bar.

It seems that time after time the Florida and the New York Court of Appeals simply denies due process or just dismisses complaints with no real reason why. And well they are the LAW and they can do that.

The question is How Long will YOU, Will "We the People" take this abuse of power... do you have no rights at all when a Court can just push paper at you year after year with this much proof and evidence.

The New York Second Circuit is Dishing up the kind of justice that will make sured Favored Law Firm Proskauer Rose is Protected as is the Reputation of the Not So Justice Judith Kaye Ex-Supreme Court Judge. Along with this Intel, Time Warner Inc., Sony, MPEG-4, MPEGLA, Bruce Sewell, Kenneth Rubenstein, and More are Protected by the Simple Stroke of a Pen by the New York Second Circuit.

The Christine C. Anderson Whistleblower Case in New York is one that you all need to pay attention to, for decades the TRUTH has been silenced and the courage of Christine C. Anderson needs to be rewarded, and SOMETHING needs to be done. Instead folks like Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe are continuing to deny rights in Related Cases to this huge Whistle Blowing Scandal Exposing the TRUE corruption in the New York Court System.

Whistleblowers like Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe don't seem to stop business as usual at the Second Circuit - Check out the Links below and see if you can make sense of the Continuing to Deny and Keep down the Due Process Rights of the Iviewit Company, the Real Inventors of a Trillion Dollar Technology that we all use every day and have for years upon years while the inventors are kept down, harasses, and have had attempted murder. Still the New York Second Circuit Court is Above Morals, Above the Law and It is Time for You the People To Speak Up and Hold them accountable for the Injustice they are dishing up.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20100109%20US%20Court%20of%20Appeal%20Denial%20of%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20and%20Appeal.pdf

Motion is Denied - Not Based in Fact they Say
Talk about Delusional I Say. Can the Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe and her Clerk not read. This is Seriously Based in Fact, and why the big law firm Proskauer Rose is Being protected and all those covering up this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft are being Protected by the New York Courts.. well it is SHOCKING and time for YOU to start asking Questions.

In the New York - United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Your RIGHTS are "Moot" - S.D.N.Y. - N.Y.C. 07-cv-11196 Scheindlin, J.

Next Document...
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf

Thousands of Documents of Proof Literally and the New York Second Circuit Court of Appeals simply, with a sway of the Pen Denies YOUR RIGHTS, your get no due process, you do not get to present you facts, they protect the Criminal and Simply say your Complaint is Not based in Fact and is MOOT... Litterally Thousands of Pages of Proof and NOT Based in Fact Says Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe -

why is New York Second Circuit So Corrupt and Allowed to Keep on Protecting the Criminals ... this Patent Theft is Fraud Against the United States Government, it involves Pay Offs, Attempted Murders, Cover Ups, Contracts not Honored, Perjury and More and the New York Second Circuit thinks it is "Moot" - something is Very Wrong in the New York Court System and the Law is Simply Irrelevant on every level.

New York Court Corruption, New York Whistle Blower, Second Circuit New York

Christine C. Anderson, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe